WebJul 8, 2024 · Obergefell v. Hodges is one of the most significant cases of the US Supreme Court, in which the Court ruled that marriage equality is a fundamental right of the citizens guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution. Issued June 26, 2015, the decision declares that all states are obliged to issue marriage certificates ... WebMay 1, 2014 · Facts. James Obergefell and John Arthur, a same-sex couple alleging that the state discriminates against same-sex couples who have married lawfully out-of-state. Arthur, who was terminally ill and suffering from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), sought to identify Obergefell as his surviving spouse on his death certificate based on their ...
Same-Sex Marriage Affirmed in Obergefell v. Hodges
WebArgument Transcripts Argument Audio Calendars and Lists Courtroom Seating Oral Argument - Audio Obergefell v. Hodges Docket Number: 14-556-Question-2 Date Argued: 04/28/15 Play Audio: Media Formats: To download file: From Windows - Right click the "Download" link and select "Save Target As..." or "Save Link As..." WebThe U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit reversed and held that the states' bans on same-sex marriage and refusal to recognize marriages performed in other states did not violate the couples' Fourteenth Amendment rights to … citizen eco drive tachymeter watch
IN THE Supreme Court of the United States - apa.org
WebApr 28, 2015 · Consent to the filing of amicus curiae briefs, in support of either party or of neither party, received from counsel for respondents Hodges, et al., in No. 14-556. VIDED. Feb 27 2015. Joint appendix for No. 14-556, 14-562 & 14-574 filed (2 volumes). VIDED. Feb 27 2015. Brief of petitioners James Obergefell, et al. filed. WebOn June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Obergefell in favor of marriage equality. The Court held that the Fourteenth Amendment (1) requires states to license marriages … WebUnited States (21-1195 Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. Hewitt (21-984 The Arizona Supreme Court’s holding below—that Lynch v. Arizona, 578 U. S. 613, did not represent … citizen eco drive strap watch